“invisible” spam

“invisible” spam

We was reading Loren’s jot down on a brand new website link offering solution from V7N. He highlights an appealing claim from the organization, which states

Contextual Links @ V7N are invisible to look engines. May it be by individual or algorithmic filtering, our links are impractical to identify. Also, an enforced agreement that is non-disclosure both writers and advertisers from exposing participating writers and advertisers.

(emphasis preserved through the initial. ) Suffice it to state, if “undetectable to find engines” is detailed among the selling that is major of a specific website link scheme, it most likely violates our quality directions therefore the instructions of other major the search engines.

The” that is“undetectable brought up fond memories of some other time some body stated in my experience that their spam had been invisible. It had been November 2002, so cue up the wavy time-warp special effect and let’s go back in its history. ??

I experienced just removed an extremely large information data recovery internet site from Bing. I was asked by them why their internet site looked like penalized. We responded with this specific e-mail:

Seem to have trash doorways with text about random SCSI things. Visiting those pages in web browser simply redirects to your website. Utilizing doorways + sneaky redirects is just a violation that is serious of spam tips. To be able to relist you (and it surely will just just just take about 7-8 days), we must have clear proof that each one of these pages have died, and that people won’t see these kinds of tricks on your own domain once again.…